Table of Contents
- 1. IEEE 1016: The Gold Standard for Formal Software Design Descriptions
- Strategic Analysis: Why IEEE 1016 Matters
- Actionable Takeaways & Access
- 2. ANSI Webstore – ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010 (Architecture Description)
- Strategic Analysis: Why ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010 Matters
- Actionable Takeaways & Access
- 3. Template.net – System/Software Design Document templates
- Strategic Analysis: Why Template.net Matters
- Actionable Takeaways & Access
- 4. Atlassian Confluence – Software architecture/design templates
- Strategic Analysis: Why Confluence Excels for Agile Teams
- Actionable Takeaways & Access
- 5. Overleaf – LaTeX Software Design Document templates
- Strategic Analysis: Why Overleaf Matters
- Actionable Takeaways & Access
- 6. Lucid (Lucidchart / Lucidspark) – Software Design Document template
- Strategic Analysis: Why Lucid’s Template Excels
- Actionable Takeaways & Access
- 7. GitHub – Standards-aligned SDD templates and real project examples
- Strategic Analysis: Why GitHub Matters
- Actionable Takeaways & Access
- 7-Point Comparison: Software Design Documentation
- Choosing Your Blueprint: A Framework for Selecting the Right SDD Resource
- A Practical Decision-Making Framework
- Your Next Steps: From Sample to System
Do not index
Do not index
Text
In software engineering, the gap between a brilliant idea and a functional, scalable product is bridged by documentation. Specifically, sample software design documentation serves as the architectural blueprint that transforms abstract concepts into concrete development plans. A well-crafted Software Design Document (SDD) is not just a formality; it's a critical communication tool that aligns stakeholders, guides engineering efforts, and prevents costly misunderstandings down the line. It ensures that everyone, from project managers to junior developers, shares a unified vision of the system's architecture, components, interfaces, and data.
Without this foundational guide, projects often suffer from scope creep, inconsistent implementation, and significant integration challenges. Starting from a blank page can be daunting and inefficient. That's why leveraging established templates and real-world examples is a strategic advantage. By building upon proven structures, teams can ensure all critical aspects are covered, from high-level system architecture and Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs) to detailed module designs and API specifications. To further understand what constitutes great design documentation, you can explore a complete design document example for any project, which provides a practical look at these components in action.
This article cuts through the noise to bring you a curated collection of the best resources for sample software design documentation. We will dive deep into each one, offering more than just a link. You’ll find a strategic breakdown of formal standards like IEEE 1016, adaptable templates from platforms like Atlassian and Lucidchart, and real-world project examples from GitHub. Each entry includes direct links, usage guidance, and actionable takeaways to help you select and adapt the perfect blueprint for your next project, ensuring clarity and precision from the very start.
1. IEEE 1016: The Gold Standard for Formal Software Design Descriptions
When the goal is to create unambiguous, auditable, and comprehensive software design documentation, the IEEE 1016 standard serves as the definitive blueprint. While many modern teams favor more lightweight approaches, this standard provides the foundational principles for formal Software Design Descriptions (SDDs). It is particularly invaluable in high-stakes, regulated industries like aerospace, medical devices, and government contracting, where precision and traceability are non-negotiable.
This standard isn't a template you simply download and fill out; it's a guide that specifies the required components and structure of a robust SDD. It establishes a common language and framework that ensures all stakeholders, from developers to auditors, share a consistent understanding of the system's architecture and design.
Strategic Analysis: Why IEEE 1016 Matters
The core strength of IEEE 1016 lies in its structured approach, centered around the concept of Design Views. This methodology forces a multi-perspective examination of the software, ensuring no critical aspect is overlooked.
- Decomposition Description: Details how the system is broken down into smaller components or modules, showing the hierarchy and relationships.
- Dependency Description: Illustrates how different parts of the system rely on each other, which is crucial for impact analysis and maintenance.
- Interface Description: Defines the exact methods of interaction between software components, or between the system and external entities.
- Detail Description: Provides the low-level logic and implementation details for each individual component.
This multi-viewpoint structure is what makes it a powerful example of thorough sample software design documentation. It ensures you document not just what the system does, but how its internal parts are constructed and interconnected.
Actionable Takeaways & Access
While the standard is currently listed as "Inactive–Reserved," its principles remain highly influential and relevant. Here’s how you can leverage it:
- Adapt, Don't Just Adopt: Even if your project doesn't require full IEEE compliance, use its Design Views as a checklist to ensure your own documentation is complete. Ask yourself: have we clearly documented decomposition, dependencies, and interfaces?
- Access Requirements: Accessing the full standard typically requires a purchase or a subscription through the IEEE Xplore Digital Library. Many universities and corporate engineering departments provide institutional access.
- Best for: Teams in regulated fields needing a defensible, auditable design record. It's also an excellent academic resource for learning the fundamentals of formal software engineering.
2. ANSI Webstore – ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010 (Architecture Description)
Where IEEE 1016 focuses on the contents of a Software Design Description (SDD), the ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010 standard addresses the foundational layer above it: the Architecture Description. This standard provides the conceptual framework for describing a system's architecture, ensuring that the design documentation effectively communicates with all relevant stakeholders by addressing their specific concerns through well-defined viewpoints. The ANSI Webstore serves as a primary U.S. distribution channel for purchasing this and other critical international standards.
This standard is not a direct template but a meta-framework that guides how you structure your architectural documentation. It defines key terms like "stakeholder," "view," "viewpoint," and "concern," creating a consistent language for architectural discussions. It is essential for teams aiming to create a formal, rigorous, and stakeholder-centric architecture that directly informs the SDD.
Strategic Analysis: Why ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010 Matters
The power of this standard is its emphasis on connecting the technical architecture to business and operational needs. It forces architects and designers to justify their decisions by linking them directly to stakeholder concerns, making it a stellar resource for building comprehensive sample software design documentation.
- Stakeholder-Centric Views: Mandates identifying stakeholders (e.g., developers, end-users, security auditors) and their unique concerns (e.g., maintainability, performance, compliance).
- Architecture Viewpoints: Defines the conventions for constructing and using a view. A viewpoint is a template from which individual architecture views are created, such as a logical viewpoint, a physical viewpoint, or a security viewpoint.
- Architecture Frameworks: Provides criteria for what constitutes a valid architecture framework, ensuring that if you adopt one (like TOGAF or DoDAF), it aligns with international best practices.
- Model-Based Rationale: Encourages documenting why certain architectural decisions were made by linking them to the concerns they address, which is crucial for long-term system evolution and maintenance.
By using this standard, you ensure your design isn't created in a vacuum. It becomes a communication tool that proves the proposed architecture solves the right problems for the right people.
Actionable Takeaways & Access
Acquiring and applying this standard requires a deliberate approach, especially since standards evolve. Here’s how to effectively use the ANSI Webstore and the 42010 standard:
- Verify the Version: The ANSI website is a straightforward purchasing portal, but always check for the latest active version. For instance, the original 2011 standard has been superseded by a 2022 revision. Use the search function to ensure you are buying the current, most relevant edition for new projects.
- Access Requirements: The standard is available for immediate purchase and PDF download from the ANSI Webstore. Pricing varies, and ANSI members may receive a discount. This purchase process is a key part of an organization's formal document control process.
- Best for: Enterprise architects, system designers, and teams in large organizations that need to align complex software systems with diverse business and regulatory stakeholders. It is foundational for creating auditable and justifiable architecture descriptions.
3. Template.net – System/Software Design Document templates
When speed and accessibility are paramount, Template.net offers a practical starting point for teams needing a structured document without the rigidity of formal standards. Instead of a comprehensive guide like IEEE, it provides immediately downloadable and editable System/Software Design Document templates in common formats like Word, Google Docs, and Apple Pages. This approach is ideal for smaller projects, internal tools, or teams transitioning toward more formalized documentation practices.
The platform's value lies in its simplicity. It provides a pre-formatted shell that a project manager or lead developer can quickly adapt and share. This lowers the barrier to entry for creating documentation, ensuring that the process doesn't get bogged down in designing the document itself, and instead focuses on filling it with relevant design information.
Strategic Analysis: Why Template.net Matters
Template.net's core strength is its focus on immediate utility and broad accessibility. The templates are designed to be understood and edited by both technical and non-technical stakeholders, fostering easier collaboration across departments.
- Accelerated Start: Eliminates the "blank page" problem by providing a standard structure covering key sections like system architecture, data design, and interface specifications.
- Format Flexibility: Offering templates in Word, Google Docs, and Pages ensures that teams can work within their existing software ecosystem without needing specialized tools.
- Standardized Appearance: For organizations looking to create a consistent look and feel across all project documentation, the wide library of related templates can be a significant asset.
- Low Technical Barrier: The familiar word-processor formats make it simple for anyone to contribute, which is a key advantage over more complex, code-based documentation systems.
This library serves as an excellent resource for anyone looking for a sample software design documentation format that prioritizes ease of use and rapid deployment over strict, formal compliance.
Actionable Takeaways & Access
While the templates provide a great starting point, they require thoughtful content to be effective. Merging their structure with strong writing principles is crucial for clarity. You can read more about technical writing best practices to enhance the quality of your final document.
- Vet Before You Commit: The quality can vary between templates. Always review the specific template's structure to ensure it meets your project's needs before adopting it.
- Check Subscription Terms: Some user reviews mention billing issues with subscriptions. It's wise to carefully evaluate the pricing and subscription tiers and consider a single purchase if it fits your needs.
- Best for: Teams needing a quick, easy-to-edit document foundation, especially where collaboration with non-technical stakeholders is important. It is also great for standardizing documentation across an organization.
4. Atlassian Confluence – Software architecture/design templates
For teams operating within an agile framework, static design documents quickly become obsolete. Atlassian Confluence addresses this by providing a collaborative platform where software design documentation is treated as a living, evolving artifact. Its purpose-built templates, like the Software Architecture Review, facilitate continuous documentation that integrates directly into the development lifecycle.
Unlike a formal standard, Confluence offers a dynamic wiki environment. This allows for real-time collaboration, feedback loops through comments, and seamless integration with Jira tickets. The result is a design document that remains relevant from initial concept through implementation and iteration, providing a single source of truth for the entire team.
Strategic Analysis: Why Confluence Excels for Agile Teams
Confluence's power lies in its deep integration with the development workflow and its focus on collaborative creation. The platform is designed to lower the barrier to documentation, making it a natural part of the engineering process rather than a separate, cumbersome task.
- Integrated Traceability: By linking Confluence pages directly to Jira issues, teams can easily trace design decisions to specific work items. This provides crucial context for developers and ensures architectural plans are followed during sprints.
- Living Documentation: The platform's templates are not meant to be final. They are starting points for discussion, review, and refinement. Real-time editing and commenting features encourage a culture where the SDD is continuously updated as the project evolves.
- Purpose-Built Templates: Confluence includes a gallery of templates for various needs, such as architecture reviews, design decision records (ADRs), and technical specifications. These provide a structured format for capturing critical information consistently.
- Collaborative Design: The ability for multiple stakeholders to edit, comment, and provide feedback on the same document simultaneously streamlines the review process and fosters shared ownership of the design.
Using Confluence for sample software design documentation shifts the focus from creating a static artifact to maintaining an active, collaborative knowledge base that supports agile development.
Actionable Takeaways & Access
To effectively leverage Confluence, teams should embrace its collaborative and integrated nature. It is less about a final, approved document and more about a continuous record of design thinking.
- Integrate with Jira: The primary value comes from the Confluence-Jira integration. Link every design document to the relevant epics or stories to create a powerful, traceable system of record.
- Establish a Template Strategy: Don't just use the default templates. Customize them to fit your team's specific needs, ensuring they capture the right level of detail for your projects.
- Access Requirements: Confluence offers a free plan for up to 10 users with core features. Standard, Premium, and Enterprise plans offer advanced features like unlimited users, greater storage, and enhanced permissions, and are priced per user.
- Best for: Agile development teams of any size that use the Atlassian ecosystem. It's ideal for creating "living documents" that evolve with sprint work and require strong stakeholder collaboration.
5. Overleaf – LaTeX Software Design Document templates
For teams that prioritize precision typesetting, complex mathematical notations, and academic rigor, Overleaf provides a powerful platform for creating professional-grade Software Design Documents using LaTeX. It offers a cloud-based collaborative environment where developers can leverage community-created templates to produce beautifully formatted, highly technical documentation without needing a local LaTeX installation.
Unlike WYSIWYG editors like Word or Google Docs, Overleaf uses a "code-to-document" approach. This makes it exceptionally well-suited for environments where the design documentation itself is treated with the same discipline as source code, including version control and collaborative review. It is a top choice in academia and R&D-heavy industries.
Strategic Analysis: Why Overleaf Matters
The primary advantage of using Overleaf is its ability to produce impeccably formatted documents that adhere to strict academic or corporate standards. The platform abstracts away the complexity of managing a LaTeX environment while providing a rich, collaborative feature set.
- Professional Typesetting: LaTeX excels at creating clean, professional layouts, managing complex cross-references, and rendering mathematical formulas and algorithms with perfect clarity. This is essential for documents detailing complex system logic.
- Version Control Integration: Overleaf projects are backed by Git, allowing teams to track changes, revert to previous versions, and manage contributions systematically, mirroring software development best practices.
- Template-Driven Workflow: By starting with a pre-built sample software design documentation template, teams can focus on content rather than formatting. Community templates often include standard sections for architecture, interfaces, and data models.
- Collaborative Editing: Real-time collaboration allows multiple authors to work on the document simultaneously, with a live-preview panel showing the rendered PDF output as they type.
This approach ensures the final document is not only comprehensive in content but also professional and consistent in its presentation, aligning with the diverse styles of documentation favored in technical fields.
Actionable Takeaways & Access
While LaTeX has a learning curve, Overleaf significantly lowers the barrier to entry. Here’s how to make the most of it:
- Find and Fork a Template: Browse the Overleaf Gallery for a Software Design Document template that fits your needs. Use the "Open as Template" feature to instantly create a copy in your own workspace to begin editing.
- Access Requirements: Overleaf offers a free tier with core features, which is sufficient for many individuals and small teams. Paid plans provide advanced features like more collaborators, full project history, and integration with GitHub. The templates themselves are typically free to use.
- Best for: Academic projects, research and development teams, and engineers who need to embed complex formulas or diagrams and require a rigorous, version-controlled documentation process. It's less ideal for teams that are not comfortable with a markup-based authoring workflow.
6. Lucid (Lucidchart / Lucidspark) – Software Design Document template
For teams that believe a picture is worth a thousand words, Lucid offers a template that tightly integrates visual diagrams with traditional text-based documentation. This approach transforms the Software Design Document (SDD) from a static, text-heavy file into a dynamic, collaborative workspace. It is especially effective for communicating complex architectures and user flows to both technical and non-technical stakeholders.
Lucid's platform allows teams to build their SDD directly alongside the flowcharts, system architecture diagrams, and sequence diagrams that define the software. This colocation of narrative and visuals ensures that the design remains consistent and easy to understand, reducing the risk of misinterpretation that can occur when documentation and diagrams are managed in separate tools.
Strategic Analysis: Why Lucid’s Template Excels
The primary advantage of Lucid's template is its unified environment, which treats diagrams as first-class citizens of the design document, not just as embedded images. This creates a more holistic and interactive planning experience.
- Integrated Visuals: The template encourages combining narrative sections (like goals, non-functional requirements, and scope) with live, editable diagrams. This makes it a comprehensive piece of sample software design documentation that bridges the gap between high-level concepts and low-level schematics.
- Collaborative Workspace: Real-time collaboration allows developers, product managers, and architects to work on the same document simultaneously. Stakeholders can comment directly on specific parts of a diagram or text, streamlining the feedback and approval process.
- Structured Content: The template provides a solid starting outline that covers key areas like functionality, milestones, and success metrics. This guides teams to think through all critical aspects of the project.
- End-to-End Design: Lucid provides a rich library of related diagram templates (UML, ERD, flowcharts), allowing teams to create all necessary design artifacts within a single ecosystem.
This approach makes the design document a living, presentation-ready artifact that evolves with the project, rather than a static document that quickly becomes outdated.
Actionable Takeaways & Access
Lucid is most effective when used as a central hub for visual design and planning. Here's how to maximize its potential:
- Prioritize Visuals for Clarity: For complex processes or architectures, start by creating the diagrams in Lucid. Then, use the template's text sections to provide context and detailed explanations that support the visuals.
- Access Requirements: While a free version of Lucidchart exists, the full-featured Software Design Document template and advanced collaboration capabilities are part of the paid Team or Enterprise plans.
- Best for: Agile teams that value visual communication and real-time collaboration. It is ideal for projects where stakeholder alignment on architecture and user flow is a critical success factor.
7. GitHub – Standards-aligned SDD templates and real project examples
For teams embracing a "documentation-as-code" philosophy, GitHub is an invaluable and practical resource. It moves beyond static documents by hosting a vast ecosystem of free, open-source Software Design Description (SDD) templates and real-world project examples, often in developer-friendly Markdown format. This approach allows design documentation to live, evolve, and be version-controlled right alongside the source code it describes.
Unlike formal standards bodies, GitHub's strength is its community-driven nature. You can find repositories with templates aligned to formal standards like IEEE 1016 or ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010, but adapted for modern, agile workflows. This makes it the perfect starting point for teams who want structure without the rigidity of traditional documentation processes.
Strategic Analysis: Why GitHub Matters
The primary advantage of using GitHub is its seamless integration into the developer's natural environment. By treating documentation as code, it becomes a living part of the project, subject to the same review, versioning, and collaboration processes as the software itself. This tight coupling promotes accuracy and traceability.
- Version-Controlled & Traceable: Storing your SDD in Git means every change is recorded. You can easily link design decisions in a commit to the specific code changes that implement them.
- Markdown-Based Simplicity: Most templates use Markdown, a lightweight markup language that is easy to write, read, and integrate with other tools. This lowers the barrier to entry for documentation contribution.
- Community-Driven Examples: You can find countless public repositories showcasing complete SDDs for various architectures, from microservices to monolithic applications. This provides a rich source of sample software design documentation to learn from.
- Forks and Adaptation: The ability to "fork" a template repository allows teams to quickly adopt a starting structure and customize it to their specific project needs without starting from scratch.
Actionable Takeaways & Access
Leveraging GitHub for your SDD is straightforward and immediately accessible. Here’s how to make the most of it:
- Find and Fork a Template: Start by searching for "Software Design Document Template" or "SDD Template" on GitHub. The
jam01/SDD-Templateis a great example. Fork it to create a copy in your own account or organization.
- Integrate into Your Workflow: Place your forked template within your project's main repository, perhaps in a
/docsfolder. This encourages developers to update it as they build. For more insights on this topic, explore some best practices for organizing documentation in a project.
- Quality Control: Since the content is community-contributed, critically evaluate any template or example you find. Ensure it meets your project's required level of detail and quality before adopting it wholesale.
- Best for: Agile development teams, open-source projects, and any organization practicing "documentation-as-code." It's ideal for those who need structured, version-controlled documentation that lives with the code.
7-Point Comparison: Software Design Documentation
Option | Implementation complexity 🔄 | Resource requirements | Expected outcomes ⭐📊⚡ | Ideal use cases 💡 | Key advantages |
IEEE 1016 (IEEE Standards Association) | High — formal structure, strict compliance 🔄 | Paid access/subscription; standards literacy | Audit-ready, consistent design docs ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 📊 | Regulated systems (medical, aerospace, gov.) 💡 | Authoritative, standards-aligned |
ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010 (ANSI Webstore) | Medium–High — architecture-focused 🔄 | Purchase; architecture expertise | Strong viewpoint/stakeholder alignment ⭐⭐⭐⭐ 📊 | Architecture-centric SDDs; linking viewpoints 💡 | Canonical architecture model; US purchase channel |
Template.net — Design Document templates | Low — plug-and-play templates 🔄 | Low cost/subscription; Word/Docs skills | Fast draft readiness; quality varies ⭐⭐⭐ ⚡📊 | Quick starts, non-regulated teams, marketing/docs 💡 | Rapid deployment; widely editable formats |
Atlassian Confluence — Templates | Medium — collaborative wiki workflows 🔄 | Confluence account; paid features for teams | Living SDDs with review traceability ⭐⭐⭐⭐ 📊⚡ | Agile teams, Jira-integrated workflows 💡 | Real-time collaboration; Jira integration |
Overleaf — LaTeX SDD templates | Medium–High — LaTeX formatting needed 🔄 | Free/community templates; LaTeX familiarity | High-quality, publication-ready PDFs ⭐⭐⭐⭐ 📊 | Academic/technical teams needing precise typesetting 💡 | Rigorous typesetting; versioned cloud editing |
Lucid (Lucidchart/Lucidspark) — Template | Medium — combined narrative+visuals 🔄 | Paid Team/Enterprise for full features | Presentation-ready, stakeholder-aligned ⭐⭐⭐⭐ 📊⚡ | Visual-heavy designs and stakeholder reviews 💡 | Strong diagram+document integration |
GitHub — Standards-aligned templates & examples | Low–Medium — docs-as-code approach 🔄 | Free/public repos; Markdown and VCS skills | Living, version-controlled SDDs; high traceability ⭐⭐⭐⭐📊 (can reach ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐) | Dev teams, CI/CD, documentation-as-code 💡 | Free, easily forkable, integrates with code workflows |
Choosing Your Blueprint: A Framework for Selecting the Right SDD Resource
Throughout this guide, we've explored a diverse landscape of sample software design documentation, from the rigorous formalism of IEEE and ISO standards to the collaborative agility of Confluence and the visual clarity of Lucidchart. We have dissected real-world examples and templates, revealing that the "perfect" SDD is not a one-size-fits-all document but a strategic asset tailored to your project's unique context. The key takeaway is clear: effective documentation is a blueprint for success, not an administrative afterthought.
Moving from theory to practice requires a deliberate selection process. The resources we've examined, such as the comprehensive templates from Template.net and the developer-centric examples on GitHub, offer distinct advantages. Your challenge is to match the tool to the task, the template to the team, and the methodology to the mission. The right documentation framework enhances communication, streamlines onboarding, and mitigates risk, while the wrong one creates friction and adds overhead.
A Practical Decision-Making Framework
To help you select the most suitable resource, consider the following factors. This framework acts as a guide to connect your specific project needs with the ideal documentation approach discussed in this article.
- For Highly Regulated or Formal Environments: If your project operates in sectors like aerospace, healthcare, or finance where compliance and auditability are non-negotiable, start with the most structured options.
- Your Go-To Resources: IEEE 1016 and ANSI/ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010 provide the foundational, comprehensive frameworks required for rigorous validation and verification. Use the official standards as your primary reference.
- For Academic and Research-Oriented Projects: When precision, reproducibility, and formal notation are paramount, a typesetting system that handles complex formulas and cross-referencing is essential.
- Your Go-To Resources: Overleaf (LaTeX) templates are designed for this. They enforce a high standard of formatting and are ideal for academic papers, dissertations, and technical reports that include software design components.
- For Agile, Fast-Paced Teams: If your team thrives on iterative development, rapid feedback loops, and collaborative knowledge sharing, your documentation should be just as dynamic.
- Your Go-To Resources: Atlassian Confluence templates, especially for Architecture Decision Records (ADRs), are built for this world. They integrate seamlessly into existing agile workflows (like Jira) and foster a living documentation culture. GitHub also excels here, allowing you to co-locate Markdown-based SDDs with the source code itself.
- For Visually-Driven Design and Communication: When conveying complex system interactions, data flows, or architectural layers, a picture is truly worth a thousand words. Visual documentation is crucial for stakeholder alignment.
- Your Go-To Resources: Lucid (Lucidchart/Lucidspark) offers powerful diagramming tools integrated into its SDD templates. This approach is perfect for creating component diagrams, sequence diagrams, and C4 models that make complex architecture instantly understandable.
When evaluating these tools, it's also critical to consider how they fit into your broader information ecosystem. Your choice should align with the best practices for effective document management, ensuring that your vital design documents are accessible, secure, and easily maintainable throughout the project lifecycle.
Your Next Steps: From Sample to System
You are now equipped with a curated collection of sample software design documentation and a framework to choose the right starting point. The journey doesn't end with selecting a template. The ultimate goal is to foster a culture where documentation is valued as a critical tool for building better software. Treat your SDD as a living document-one that evolves with your system, captures crucial decisions, and empowers every member of your team to contribute effectively. By investing in clear, purposeful, and well-maintained documentation, you are not just planning a project; you are building a foundation for sustainable innovation and long-term success.
Tired of manually searching through endless folders of design documents and technical specs to find one critical detail? Documind transforms your static documentation archive into a dynamic, queryable knowledge base. Simply upload your SDDs, ADRs, and architectural diagrams, and ask direct questions to get instant, accurate answers. Stop digging and start designing with Documind.